On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 7:49 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> No, but I'd rather see us commit a checksum patch that sometimes > carries a major performance penalty and then work to reduce that > penalty later than never commit anything at all. I think it's > unrealistic to assume we're going to get this perfectly right in one > try. I am not sure whether this particular patch is close enough for > government work or still needs more hacking, and it may well be the > latter, but there is no use holding our breath and waiting for > absolute perfection. Well said. My view completely. I do want jam tomorrow, I just want bread and butter today as well. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
