Benedikt Grundmann <bgrundm...@janestreet.com> wrote: > For what's worth here are the numbers on one of our biggest > databases (same system as I posted about separately wrt > seq_scan_cost vs random_page_cost). That's would be a 88.4% hit rate on the summarized data. -Kevin
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
