2011/12/23 Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com>: > On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 5:56 AM, Kohei KaiGai <kai...@kaigai.gr.jp> wrote: >> I'd like the regression test on select_view test being committed also >> to detect unexpected changed in the future. How about it? > > Can you resend that as a separate patch? I remember there were some > things I didn't like about it, but I don't remember what they were at > the moment... > Sorry for this late response.
The attached one is patch of the regression test that checks scenario of malicious function with/without security_barrier option. I guess you concerned about that expected/select_views_1.out is patched, not expected/select_views.out. I'm not sure the reason why regression test script tries to make diff between results/select_views and expected/select_views_1.out. Thanks, -- KaiGai Kohei <kai...@kaigai.gr.jp>
pgsql-regtest-leaky-views.patch
Description: Binary data
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
