On Dec 20, 2011, at 10:39 AM, Claes Jakobsson wrote: > Are people explicitly asking for a) *JSON* datatype or b) a type that lets > you store arbitrary complex semi-untyped data structures?
Yes. > if b) then this might get a lot more interesting JSON is the most popular/likely way to represent that, I think. David -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers