Noah Misch <n...@leadboat.com> writes:
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 11:13:57PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> ... but this performance test seems to me to be entirely misguided,
>> because it's testing a situation that isn't going to occur much in the
>> field, precisely because the syscache should prevent constant reloads of
>> the same syscache entry.
>> [ideas for more-realistic tests]
> Granted, but I don't hope to reliably measure a change in a macro-benchmark
> after seeing a rickety 2% change in a micro-benchmark.
No, I'm not sure about that at all. In particular I think that
CatalogCacheFlushCatalog is pretty expensive and so the snapshot costs
could be a larger part of a more-realistic test.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
