On tis, 2011-12-13 at 00:06 -0800, Peter van Hardenberg wrote: > On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 9:25 PM, Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> wrote: > > On mån, 2011-12-12 at 16:51 -0800, Peter van Hardenberg wrote: > > You don't need a new PL to do that. The existing PLs can also parse > > JSON. So that's not nearly enough of a reason to consider adding this > > new PL. > > PL/V8 is interesting because it is very fast, sandboxed, and well > embedded with little overhead. > > My experience with PL/Python and PL/Perl has not been thus, and > although they are handy if you want to break out and run system work, > they're not the kind of thing I'd consider for defining performant > operators with.
Some performance numbers comparing a valid_json() functions implemented in different ways would clarify this. I wouldn't be surprised if PL/V8 won, but we need to work with some facts. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
