On Sat, 2002-07-13 at 10:27, Tom Lane wrote: > Rod Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I noticed that SERIAL sequences aren't dropping with the application of > > the patch. > > > Was this intentional? > > Yeah, the dependency isn't stored yet. I didn't like the way you did > that, and was trying to think of a better way... > > More generally, a lot of dependencies that should be in place aren't > yet. I committed as soon as I had stable functionality that more or > less duplicated the former behavior; there's more patch still to review.
I eventually figured that out. I had only initially noticed a couple of missing items which would have been easy to miss. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
