On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > On the whole, it might not be a bad idea to have two allowed signatures > for the validator function, rather than inventing an additional column > in pg_language. But the fundamental point IMHO is that there needs to > be a provision to pass language-dependent validation options to the > function, whether it's the existing validator or a separate checker > entry point.
Something like: CHECK FUNCTION proname(proargs) WITH (...fdw-style elastic options...) ? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
