> Has anyone studied how other DBMSs handle CHAR vs VARCHAR? Judging > from the number of questions we get on this point, I have to wonder > if we are not out of step with the way other systems do it.
Well, I already gave the Informix example, that compares them as equal. (they obviously coerce varchar to char) In nearly all cases I have seen so far the different handling of trailing blanks is not wanted. In most of these varchar is simply used instead of char to save disk space. In Informix ESQL/C there is a host variable type CSTRINGTYPE that automatically rtrims columns of char type upon select. Imho the advantages of an automatic coercion would outweigh the few corner cases where the behavior would not be intuitive to everybody. Andreas ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
