On Nov 24, 2011, at 1:57 AM, Alexander Shulgin <a...@commandprompt.com> wrote: > While it is really tempting to provide support for all that fancy stuff (or > at least support "user:password@host" part instead of the ugly > "?user=&password=") this will make psql URIs backward-incompatible with the > JDBC syntax, which is exactly what we want to avoid.
I think it would be really weird not to support user:pw@host:port. You can presumably also support the JDBC style for backward compatibility, but I don't think we should adopt that syntax as project standard. ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
