> Jan Wieck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I think the idea was to have it default to CASCADE for this release, not > > to break existing code right away. > > I never thought that. If we default to CASCADE then a DROP is likely to > delete stuff that it would not have deleted in prior releases. That > seems *far* more dangerous than "breaking existing code". I doubt > there's much existing code that does automatic DROPs anyway, at least > of things that might have dependencies.
Wow - I think defaulting to CASCADE is nuts! Surely RESTRICT should be the safest default? Chris ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
