On Nov11, 2011, at 19:17 , Tom Lane wrote: > But frankly I do not like any of these proposals. Making fundamental > changes in long-established semantics in the name of squeezing out a few > cycles is the wrong way to design software.
Hm, then maybe this is one of the things to put onto the next protocol version todo list? best regards, Florian Pflug -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
