On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 11:57 PM, Nikhil Sontakke <nikkh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > >> >> But if it's deemed to be a >> problem, I want to see a solution that's actually watertight.) >> > > After Daniel's hunch about pg_dump barfing due to such leftover entries > proving out to be true, we have one credible explanation (there might be > other reasons too) for this long standing issue. I see some reports from as > early as 2004 and some as latest as Feb, 2011!
The 2004 report was in version 7.3, released in 2002. So it's Very Nearly a ten year old bug, and may very well go back further back in time. -- fdr -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
