On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 3:39 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Doing that actually makes the patch simpler, so I went ahead and did > that in the attached version, along with the renaming mentioned above.
Hearing no objections, I went ahead and committed this version. Thanks for coding this up; I think this is a very useful improvement. It would still be nice to fix the case where we need to freeze a tuple that is on a page someone else has pinned, but I don't have any good ideas for how to do that. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
