On Mon, 2011-11-07 at 10:18 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Jeff Davis <[email protected]> writes:
> > I'm looking for known problem areas in btree_gist. I see:
> > http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/[email protected]
>
> > With Range Types, I'm anticipating that btree_gist will become more
> > important, so I'd like to know what bugs are holding it back.
>
> > So, anything else come to mind? Or does btree_gist just need a good
> > review? Or have the problems been fixed?
>
> The thing I was complaining about in the referenced message is specific
> to the inet opclass; it's unfair to make it sound like it's a generic
> problem with btree_gist. And no, it's not been fixed AFAIK.
Sorry, I thought I remembered a few other comments but couldn't find
them in the archives. I must be mistaken.
Regards,
Jeff Davis
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
