On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Kohei KaiGai <kai...@kaigai.gr.jp> wrote: > I had checked my older implementation based on 8.4.x or 9.0.x that > includes all the features that I want to implement. > At least, it does not require so much different information from ones > needed by DAC model, although SELECT INTO was an exception. > It might be quite natural because both works similar things.
OK. It seems like it might be helpful to put together a list of all of the things you want to check permissions on, maybe on a wiki page somewhere, and indicate in there which ones are done and which ones are not done, and what additional information you think is needed in each case, and flag any MAC/DAC discrepancies that you are concerned about. I think that might help us reach agreement on the best way forward. Also, then, as we get things committed, we can track progress versus that roadmap. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
