Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 11:27 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> One thing worth asking is why we're willing to violate half a dozen
>> different coding rules if we see ProcDiePending, yet we're perfectly
>> happy to rely on the client understanding a WARNING for the
>> QueryCancelPending case. Another is whether this whole function isn't
>> complete BS in the first place, since it appears to be coded on the
>> obviously-false assumption that nothing it calls can throw elog(ERROR)
>> --- and of course, if any of those functions do throw ERROR, all the
>> argumentation here goes out the window.
> Well, there is a general problem that anything which throws an ERROR
> too late in the commit path is Evil; and sync rep makes that worse to
> the extent that it adds more stuff late in the commit path, but it
> didn't invent the problem. What it did do is add stuff late in the
> commit path that can block for a potentially unbounded period of time,
> and I don't see that there are any solutions to that problem that
> aren't somewhat grotty.
No doubt, but fantasizing about what you are or are not controlling
doesn't help ... and AFAICT this code is mostly fantasy. Anyway,
I don't have a better proposal right offhand; will think about it.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
