On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 12:11 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 11:54 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc3629.html > >> I'm still confused. The input string is already known to be valid >> UTF-8, so the second byte (if there is one) must be between 0x80 and >> 0xBF. Therefore it will be neither 0xED nor 0xF4. > > I haven't read the patch lately, but ED and F4 are special as *first* > bytes. Maybe the logic isn't quite right, or you read it wrong?
I think I'll let the patch author comment on that. It looks wrong to me, but I just work here. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
