On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 9:35 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > > I assume this was addressed with this commit: > > commit 465883b0a2b4236ba6b31b648a9eabef3b7cdddb > Author: Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> > Date: Tue Jun 28 22:58:17 2011 +0100 > > Introduce compact WAL record for the common case of commit > (non-DDL). > XLOG_XACT_COMMIT_COMPACT leaves out invalidation messages and > relfilenodes, > saving considerable space for the vast majority of transaction > commits. > XLOG_XACT_COMMIT keeps same definition as XLOG_PAGE_MAGIC 0xD067 > and earlier. > > Leonardo Francalanci and Simon Riggs
No, that's completely unrelated. I think it just never quite made it to prime time - it was analyzed theoretically but some of the testing discussed on the thread doesn't seem to have been done. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
