> What is the logic for not dumping passwords but the CREATE ROLE > statement? I don't see how anyone would recognize that behavior as > logical. If you want to add a --no-passwords option to pg_dumpall, that > seems more logical to me.
That's what I'm suggesting. Incidentally, what's the difference between -g and -r in terms of actual output, anyway? -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
