On Tue, 2011-10-11 at 12:09 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> The cure seems worse than the disease. What is so bad about '[]'?
OK, so we stick with the 3-argument form. Do we have a default for the
third argument, or do we scrap it to avoid confusion?
There were some fairly strong objections to using '[]' as the default or
having the default vary between types. So, the only real option
remaining, if we do have a default, is '[)'.
Regards,
Jeff Davis
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
