On mån, 2011-10-03 at 11:27 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Frankly, I am confused how this breakage has gone unreported for so > long.
Well, nobody is required to use pg_ctl, and for the longest time, it was pg_ctl that was considered to be broken (for various other reasons) and avoided in packaged init scripts. Arguably, if push came to shove, pg_upgrade wouldn't really need to use pg_ctl either. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
