On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 12:44 AM, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote: > Would it make sense for pg_start_backup() to have the ability to wait > for the next restartpoint in a case like this, if we know that FPW has > been set? Instead of failing? Or maybe that's just overcomplicating > things when trying to be user-friendly.
I don't think that it's worth adding code for such a feature. Because I believe there are not many users who enable FPW on-the-fly for standby-only backup and use such a feature. Regards, -- Fujii Masao NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
