On sön, 2011-09-25 at 23:49 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > In fact, I've been wondering if we ought to go a step further and not > recurse into the sepgsql directory for *any* of the targets. Then we > could get rid of the associated configure option, which no longer > serves any other purpose, and just say that if you want to build (or > regression-test) sepgsql, well, you gotta go to that directory and do > it by hand.
I'm not in favor of that. It's nice to have a uniform interface that decides what to build. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
