On Sep23, 2011, at 18:45 , Robert Haas wrote: > Ah. I think you are right - Heikki made the same point. Maybe some > of the stuff that happens just after this comment: > > /* > * Initialize for Hot Standby, if enabled. We won't let backends in > * yet, not until we've reached the min recovery point specified in > * control file and we've established a recovery snapshot from a > * running-xacts WAL record. > */ > > > ...actually needs to be postponed until after we've reached consistency?
I came the the same conclusion. It seems the before we've reached consistency, we shouldn't attempt to read anything because the data can be pretty arbitrarily garbled. best regards, Florian Pflug -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
