> But I don't think we're required to support that case. If the user > does a non-standard install, it's their job to deal with the fallout.
Well, I'll write the script anyway, since *I* need it. I'm installing this on a 9.0 database which will be later upgraded to 9.1. However, before I write all this, I'd like to settle the question of acceptability. What do I need to do to make it OK to break backwards compatibility for this? I feel strongly that I'm correcting it to the behavior users expect, but that's not statistically backed. I don't want to spend several hours writing scripts so that it can be rejected *for that reason*. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
