On Sep 12, 2011, at 10:24 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On ons, 2011-09-07 at 10:00 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> There has however >> been some debate about the exact extent of ignoring bad values during >> reload --- currently the theory is "ignore the whole file if anything is >> wrong", but there's some support for applying all non-bad values as long >> as the overall file syntax is okay. > > That could be a problem if you have some values that depend on each > other, and then you change both of them, but because of an error only > one gets applied. I think ACID(-like) changes is a feature, also on > this level. > I think exactly this argument has already been discussed earlier in this thread: http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/21310d95-eb8d-4b15-a8bc-0f05505c6...@phlo.org -- Alexey Klyukin http://www.commandprompt.com The PostgreSQL Company – Command Prompt, Inc. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
