On 12/09/2011, at 3:59 PM, Florian Pflug wrote: > If you really meant to say "intr" there (and not "nointr") then that probably > explains the partial writes. > > Still, I agree with Noah and Kevin that we ought to deal more gracefully with > this, i.e. resubmit after a partial read() or write(). AFAICS there's nothing > to be gained by not doing that, and the increase in code complexity should be > negligible. If we do that, however, I believe we might as well handle EINTR > correctly, even if SA_RESTART should prevent us from ever seeing that.
Hi Florian, You are indeed correct. Setting nointr also resolves my issue. I could swear I checked this, but obviously not. It does still concern me that pgsql did not deal with this as gracefully as other software. I hope the list will consider a patch to resolve that. Thanks in advance, George -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
