On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 7:05 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> That's an option. But I don't think that finding an existing file is so >> serious >> problem. > > The recommendation should be that the archived files are never > overwritten because that prevents a huge range of data loss bugs and > kills them stone dead.
I'm OK with that default behavior of the executable. It's helpful if the executable supports overwrite-if-filesize-is-not-16MB option. Regards, -- Fujii Masao NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
