On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 15:55, Greg Stark <st...@mit.edu> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: >> Well, I assume we are done for another five years. The includes removed >> were minimal, especially considering five years of work. >> > > What I wouldn't mind seeing is a graph of all includes and what they > include. This might help figure out what layering violations there are > like the one that caused this mess. I think I've seen tools to do this > already somewhere.
http://doxygen.postgresql.org will do some of that, but I think not globally - but if you click into one header, I think it shows you the map from that perspective. -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
