> I've committed this, but I still think it would be helpful to revise
> that comment. The turn "boosted up" is not very precise or
> informative. Could you submit a separate, comment-only patch to
> improve this?
>
I tried to put more detailed explanation about the logic of do { ... } while
loop of sepgsql_avc_check_valid and the cache field of new security label to
be switched on execution of the procedure. Is it helpful?Thanks, -- NEC Europe Ltd, SAP Global Competence Center KaiGai Kohei <kohei.kai...@emea.nec.com>
pgsql-uavc-comments-update.patch
Description: pgsql-uavc-comments-update.patch
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
