On 31.08.2011 18:20, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
I've just stumbled across this, which appears to be a regression from
8.4 that is present in 9.0 and master:

andrew=# create table foo (x int primary key);
NOTICE: CREATE TABLE / PRIMARY KEY will create implicit index
"foo_pkey" for table "foo"
CREATE TABLE
andrew=# alter table foo rename x to y;
ALTER TABLE
andrew=# select attname from pg_attribute where attrelid =
'foo_pkey'::regclass;
attname
---------
x
(1 row)

In 8.4 the index attribute is renamed correctly.

That was intentional:

commit c176e122222c63844c0a2f3f8c568c3fe6c57d15
Author: Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date:   Wed Dec 23 16:43:43 2009 +0000

Remove code that attempted to rename index columns to keep them in sync with their underlying table columns. That code was not bright enough to cope with collision situations (ie, new name conflicts with some other column of the index). Since there is no functional reason to do this at all, trying to
    upgrade the logic to be bulletproof doesn't seem worth the trouble.

This change means that both the index name and the column names of an index
    are set when it's created, and won't be automatically changed when the
underlying table columns are renamed. Neatnik DBAs are still free to rename
    them manually, of course.



--
  Heikki Linnakangas
  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to