On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 6:29 PM, Jim Nasby <j...@nasby.net> wrote: > Actually, I wasn't thinking about the system dynamically sizing shared memory > on it's own... I was only thinking of providing the ability for a user to > change something like shared_buffers and allow that change to take effect > with a SIGHUP instead of requiring a full restart.
I agree. That would be awesome. Sadly, I don't have time to work on it. :-( -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
