hubert depesz lubaczewski wrote:
> hi
>
> I have 8.3.11 database, ~ 600GB in size.
>
> I want to upgrade it to 9.0.
>
> First, I tried with 9.0.4, and when I hit problem (the same) I tried
> git, head of 9.0 branch.
Good.
> pg_upgrade_dump_db.sql-
> pg_upgrade_dump_db.sql--- For binary upgrade, must preserve relfilenodes
> pg_upgrade_dump_db.sql-SELECT
> binary_upgrade.set_next_heap_relfilenode('71637068'::pg_catalog.oid);
> pg_upgrade_dump_db.sql:SELECT
> binary_upgrade.set_next_toast_relfilenode('71637071'::pg_catalog.oid);
> pg_upgrade_dump_db.sql-SELECT
> binary_upgrade.set_next_index_relfilenode('71637073'::pg_catalog.oid);
> pg_upgrade_dump_db.sql-
> pg_upgrade_dump_db.sql-CREATE TABLE actions (
> --
> pg_upgrade.log-linking /var/postgresql/6666/base/113953649/2613 to
> /var/postgresql/6666-9.0/base/11826/11790
> pg_upgrade.log- /var/postgresql/6666/base/113953649/2683
> pg_upgrade.log-linking /var/postgresql/6666/base/113953649/2683 to
> /var/postgresql/6666-9.0/base/11826/11792
> pg_upgrade.log:Could not find 71637071 in old cluster
The problem appears to be that the Postgres catalogs think there is a
toast table for 'actions', while the file system doesn't seem to have
such a file. I can you look in pg_class and verify that?
SELECT reltoastrelid FROM pg_class WHERE relname = 'actions';
Then look in the file system to see if there is a matching file.
> One more thing - one of earlier tests actually worked through
> pg_upgrade, but when running vacuumdb -az on newly started 9.0.4, I got
> error about missing transaction/clog - don't remember exactly what it
> was, though.
THere was a bug in how how pg_upgrade worked in pre-9.0.4 --- could it
have been that?
--
Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
