Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> writes: > Note that the progress indicator will *always* count wrong when you > choose to include WAL, since we just don't know how much WAL there > should be. I guess in this case we could just advance the "end > counter" as well as we go, making sure it doesn't shoot above 100%. > > Does that seem reasonable?
Yes. If you're interested into the progress being made and the goal is moving, it's better to know about that. Regards, -- Dimitri Fontaine http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
