Robert Haas wrote: > Works for me. Just to confirm, that means we'd also change GEQO to > use pg_erand48(). > > > BTW, as far as the original plan of using random_r is concerned, how > > did you manage to not run into this? > > http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3662 > > I just wasted half an hour on that stupidity in an unrelated context... > > Good grief. It's hard to imagine a more user-hostile attitude than > the one taken there. I did run into that precise issue, but managed
Yes, it is scary to think people are relying on software written by people which such a poor attitude toward quality. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
