On Aug 12, 2011, at 10:03 PM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > On 11.08.2011 23:06, Robert Haas wrote: >> Comments, testing, review appreciated... > > I would've expected this to use an index-only scan: > > postgres=# CREATE TABLE foo AS SELECT generate_series(1,100000) AS id; > SELECT 100000 > postgres=# CREATE INDEX i_foo ON foo (id) WHERE id = 10; > CREATE INDEX > postgres=# VACUUM ANALYZE foo; > VACUUM > postgres=# EXPLAIN SELECT id FROM foo WHERE id = 10; > QUERY PLAN > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > Index Scan using i_foo on foo (cost=0.00..8.27 rows=1 width=4) > Index Cond: (id = 10) > (2 rows) > > If it's not a predicate index, then it works: > > postgres=# DROP INDEX i_foo; > DROP INDEX > postgres=# EXPLAIN SELECT id FROM foo WHERE id = 10; > QUERY PLAN > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > Index Only Scan using i_foo2 on foo (cost=0.00..8.28 rows=1 width=4) > Index Cond: (id = 10) > (2 rows)
is there any plan to revise the cost for index only scans compared to what it is now? many thanks, hans -- Cybertec Schönig & Schönig GmbH Gröhrmühlgasse 26 A-2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria Web: http://www.postgresql-support.de -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers