On ons, 2011-08-10 at 14:26 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 2:24 PM, Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> wrote: > > It's come up before: > > <http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-09/msg01293.php> > > I was about to wonder out loud if we might be trying to hit a moving > target....
I think we are dealing with a lot more moving targets than adding a new version of SHA every 12 to 15 years. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
