On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 15:25, Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> wrote: > > > On 08/10/2011 09:03 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote: >> >> On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 03:25, Andrew Dunstan<and...@dunslane.net> wrote: >>> >>> On 07/06/2011 08:26 PM, Brar Piening wrote: >>>> >>>> -------- Original Message -------- >>>> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Review of VS 2010 support patches >>>> From: Andrew Dunstan<and...@dunslane.net> >>>> To: Brar Piening<b...@gmx.de> >>>> Date: 06.07.2011 22:58 >>>> >>>>>> I'll remove my versions from the patch (v9 probably) if those files >>>>>> get >>>>>> commited. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I'm just doing some final testing and preparing to commit the new >>>>> pgflex >>>>> and pgbison. >>>> >>>> The attached patch includes documentation changes and excludes my >>>> versions >>>> of pgbison.pl and pgflex.pl which have been replaced by Andrews' >>>> versions >>>> that are already commited. >>>> >>>> As before "perltidy_before.patch" has to be applied first and >>>> "VS2010v9.patch" second. >>>> >>>> >>> I just started looking at this a bit. One small question: why are we >>> using >>> "use base qw(foo);" instead of "use parent qw(foo);" which I understand >>> is >>> preferred these days? >> >> I am no perl expert, but I see we are using this already today - in >> code written by you in one case ;) I'd assume it was just following >> the same standard... If the other way is the way to do it today, I see >> no reason not to change it to use that. >> > > Umm, where are we using it today? > > [andrew@emma pg_head]$ grep -r -P 'use\s+base' . > ./doc/src/sgml/release-old.sgml: what lexer you use based on the > platform you use. > ./doc/src/sgml/charset.sgml: encoding to use based on the > specified or default locale. > ./src/backend/commands/aggregatecmds.c: * Old style: use > basetype parameter. This supports aggregates of > ./autom4te.cache/output.0:# Required to use basename. > ./autom4te.cache/output.0:# Required to use basename. > ./configure:# Required to use basename. > ./configure:# Required to use basename. > [andrew@emma pg_head]$
Meh. I am clearly not back in the game since my vacation. I didn't realize base was a keyword... Ignore and move on, nothing to see here. -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers