Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of lun ago 08 12:05:05 -0400 2011: > We could do that, but what the heck is the point? What benefit are > we trying to get by not returning a pointer to the structure? I feel > like we're making this ludicrously complicated with no real > justification of why all of this complexity is adding any value.
I don't see that it's complicated in any way. Seems pretty simple to me. The justification is simple too: don't export struct definitions without need. -- Álvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
