On Aug 7, 2011, at 11:01 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 8:57 AM, Hannu Krosing <ha...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> In 9.0 (as in earlier versions) a former standby host has to do a full
>> checkpoint before becoming available as an independent database instance
>> in either switchover or failover scenarios.
>>
>> For most combinations of of bigger than minimal shared buffers and
>> non-memory-speed disks this can take from several seconds to tens of
>> minutes on busy systems.
>
> For switchover, you issue a checkpoint first, to reduce this time as
> much as possible.
>
>> Is the pre-activation checkpoint still required in 9.1 ?
>
> Yes, but I've found a way to remove them in 9.2 and will be patching that
> soon.
hi simon,
this is highly interesting. this is am important issue for big iron.
can you share the idea you have in mind?
many thanks,
hans
--
Cybertec Schönig & Schönig GmbH
Gröhrmühlgasse 26
A-2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria
Web: http://www.postgresql-support.de
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
