On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 8:44 AM, Boszormenyi Zoltan <z...@cybertec.at> wrote:
> 2011-08-04 14:32 keltezéssel, Robert Haas írta:
>> 2011/8/4 Boszormenyi Zoltan <z...@cybertec.at>:
>>> Shouldn't these get fixed to be consistent?
>> I believe I already did.  See commit 
>> 85b436f7b1f06a6ffa8d2f29b03d6e440de18784.
>
> I meant a mass "sed -e 's/TRUE/true/g'  -e 's/FALSE/false/g'" run
> so all the ~200 occurrences of both "TRUE" and "FALSE" get
> converted so the whole source tree is consistent.

Oh, I see.  Well, I don't care either way, so I'll let others weigh
in.  The way it is doesn't bother me, but fixing it doesn't bother me
either.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to