On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 4:18 AM, Alexander Korotkov <aekorot...@gmail.com> wrote: > I found that in previous version of patch I missed PageSetLSN > and PageSetTLI, but huge amount of WAL is still here. Also I found that huge > amount of WAL appears only with -O2. With -O0 amount of WAL is ok, but > messages "FATAL: xlog flush request BFF11148/809A600 is not satisfied --- > flushed only to 44/9C518750" appears. Seems that there is some totally wrong > use of WAL if even optimization level does matter...
Try setting wal_debug=true to see what records are getting emitted. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
