Nikhil Sontakke <nikhil.sonta...@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> What we need is to persist information of a particular constraint to be as
> specified - ONLY for this table. We could do that by adding a new column in
> pg_constraint like 'connoinh' or something, but I guess we would prefer not
> to get into the initdb business.
Uh, why not? I trust you're not imagining this would get back-patched.
> Alternatively we could bring about the same
> by using a combination of conislocal and coninhcnt.
Ugh. New column, please. If you're wondering why, see the flak Robert
has been taking lately for replacing pg_class.relistemp. Random changes
in the semantics of existing columns are trouble.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
