Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> A wakeup once every half hour would surely not be an issue from a power
>> consumption standpoint. However, I'm not sure I understand here: aren't
>> we trying to remove the timeouts completely?
> Well, in the case of the AV launcher, the issue is that the main loop
> is timed by definition, cf. autovacuum_naptime, and the WaitLatch()
> interface is apparently designed so that we can't sleep longer than 35
> minutes.
Hmm. Well, it's not too late to rethink the WaitLatch API, if we think
that that might be a significant limitation. Offhand I don't see that
it is, though.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
