On Jul 13, 2011, at 12:14 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: >> I'm wondering if it would be possible to restore the relistemp column >> to pg_class, at least for backwards compatibility, so that apps that >> expected it can continue to work on both 9.0 and 9.1. Even if it's >> read-only somehow, and the same as `relpersistence <> 't'`. > > Uh, that is going to require an initdb, and it is unlinkely we are going > to need that this far into 9.1 beta.
I was afraid of that. > Also, we don't normally keep > system table columns around for backward compatibility because of the > confusion it can cause, e.g. which column do I look at? The one that's documented. Wasn't newsysviews supposed to deal with these sorts of issues? Why were they rejected? Best, David -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
