On 13.07.2011 21:56, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
Thank you very much for detail explanation. But this line of modified patch seems strange for me: *newchildoffnum = blkno; I believe it should be: *newchildoffnum = i;
Yes, you're right. It's scary that it worked during testing anyway. Maybe the resulting tree was indeed broken but it didn't affect the subsequent inserts so I didn't notice.
-- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
