Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Maybe we could just add a paragraph above the "pg_locks Columns" table
>> that says explicitly that virtualtransaction and pid describe the entity
>> holding or awaiting the lock, and the others describe the object being
>> locked? Any way you slice it, putting this information into the
>> per-column table is going to be repetitive.
> Frankly, whenever anyone says "object", they might as well call it
> "thing". It seems to be a content-less word. Maybe just replace the
> word "object" with "lock".
No, because that conflates the lock with the thing being locked.
Fuzzing that semantic difference isn't going to make it less confusing.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
