Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> writes: >> 2011/7/10 Jaime Casanova <ja...@2ndquadrant.com>: >>> big part of this seems to be (based on the examples on the page, >>> haven't read the patch) scripting functionality but now that we have >>> DO, is really a need for that?
> note - a output from DO statement is limited to RAISE statement - you > can't send back a SELECT's result You can't *today*. But it's a very good question whether it wouldn't make more sense to solve these problems by extending DO rather than adding things into psql. Functionality in DO will be available to non-psql clients. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers