On Wed, Jun 19, 2002 at 10:14:32AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > I agree it's not pleasant to be blocked like this. Is there any way we > can persuade the bison guys to be a little more urgent about releasing a > fix? (If 1.49 is just an internal beta version, maybe a back-patch to > their last released version?)
I had the feeling they rewrote some major parts. You cannot back-patch that. But then I may err on this. > Another possibility is to temporarily disable ecpg from being built by > default (eg, just remove it from src/interfaces/Makefile) and then go > ahead and commit your changes. Then, anyone wanting to test it would > have to (a) have a suitable bison installed and (b) manually go into > interfaces/ecpg and say "make all install". I can't say that I like > this idea, but it seems better than putting derived files into CVS. That would be possible too. > PS: BTW, are any of the bison people at Red Hat? Maybe I could apply > a little internal pressure... No idea, sorry. Michael -- Michael Meskes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL! ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
